fashion is not my bag.
though bags do play a large part in my
fashion choices.
i live by the jobs/zuckerberg school of
dressing – i just throw a little more variety into it. instead of
large walk in closets filled with numerous versions of the same style
and colour tops, and bottoms of the same colour and style. i operate
under the two bag system – one bag contains the clean clothes and
the other contains the dirty clothes. a quick dive into the clean bag
brings out the clean top, pants and socks for the day, the bottoms
being used for several days. easy peasey. sadly i haven't invented a
new style of computing or social media with all the time i have saved
through my streamlined dressing).
(and no while i might look like i have
dressed from the dirty bag, even i don't make that mistake.)
so me and fashion are not even close to
being pals.
probably the last time i was in fashion
was when i was in nappies, because nappies are pretty universal (and
i am not talking about adult baby fantasy here). the last 54 years me
and fashion have parted company.
of course my lack of fashion sense or
interest doesn't stop me from looking at some fashion choices and
think what the fuck, no really what the fuck.
seriously why has the low slung jeans/
trousers become a fashion staple, why did it ever become popular in
the first place? most people who sport the fashion do not have the
body for it and as they shuffle charlie chaplin like down the street
doing the i have shat my pants waddle. of course if you are young and
have a gym honed body then perhaps you can carry it off, and the
makers of the pants you are wearing are pleased for the extra
publicity. the majority of wears tend not to be like this and
seemingly they don't necessarily want the pants either. in a large
number of cases you are confronted low jeans, no pants and a flabby
arse with a dirty crack of doom. trust me that isn't a look anyone
wants to be having. more to the point it is a look that most of us
don't want to see.
gents put your arses away and pull
those strides up.
the current fashion craze i don't
understand harks back to something i loved as a kid/teenager: ripped
jeans. back when i had ripped jeans it was because i had done
something to wear the material out, it was a badge of effort. those
ripped knees were a sign you had been out being active. now such rips
and tears are fashion statement – except it doesn't stop at rips
and tears it is whole chunks of the jeans that are missing, and it
isn't just one rip or tear it is loads of them, in some cases there
are more holes than there is jeans.
why? what is so special about tramp
chic? other than you are showing the world you have more money than
sense and you can afford to dress shabbily and all your peer group
and other fashionistas will congratulate you on your brand choice and
admire your taste for looking just like them.
maybe that is the point – it is a
signifier that you belong with the others who wear jeans that are
torn to shreds and have large holes all over them (of maybe more
accurately – they have a bit of jeans defining empty space of the
fashion statement.
to me clothes are something i have to
wear, so something easy, practical and comfortable to wear. no
hassle, pluck it from the bag and put it on. i don't want to be
navigating holes to make sure i don't rip the item any more than it
already is, after all i wouldn't want to ruin the look of such
stylish clothes.
maybe it is best that i stick with
sensible bland clothing as i am pretty sure that old chubby blokes
shouldn't be trying to make fashion statements. ever.
No comments:
Post a Comment